Method and system for marking an object having a surface of a conductive material

ABSTRACT

The present invention describes a method for marking an object ( 18 ), the object ( 18 ) having a surface of a conductive material. The method comprises a step of applying an electric spark to the surface such that the material is at least one of partially melted and partially ablated by the electric spark, thereby forming a pattern on the object ( 18 ). Further, the present application relates to a marking system ( 10 ) for marking an object ( 18 ) using a spark generator ( 12 ) having a counter electrode ( 14 ) and a connector ( 16 ) for electrically connecting the spark generator ( 12 ) to the surface of the object ( 18 ) to be marked. Further, the present application relates to an authenticating system for authenticating or identifying an object ( 18 ) marked by the above described method for marking the object ( 18 ).

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to the field of marking an object having asurface of a conductive material, namely, a method and a system formarking such object. Usually, the marking is suitable for anidentification or authentication of the marked object.

BACKGROUND

It is common to mark certain objects such as guns, ammunition orvaluables to be able to identify individual objects or to authenticatean object. Generally, the intention can be to apply a mark to an objectwhich mark is unique, comparable to a fingerprint, can be easilyrecognized and, thus, allows for easy identification or authenticationof the object. In this regard, it is an important aim that the markcannot be copied or counterfeited in as much as possible.

Today, marking solutions are based on unique materials, patterning orphysical properties of a mark. Such marks are usually created byprinting technology, laser engraving or mechanical engraving. Most ofthese marks are generated from predetermined code, applied in the formof symbols, and reconfirmed by a reading and identification process.

However, such marks can often be copied or counterfeited. This is,because the technology for applying the mark on the basis of apredetermined code can usually also be used by an unauthorized personfor counterfeiting or copying the mark. The predetermined code usuallyis not really random. Only very few marking processes are suitable forproducing marks of naturally random characteristics. These processeswould have to rely on chaotic dynamic processes in order to be suitableto produce a really random mark. Known random features rely on randomarrangement of fibres, bubbles, stains or flakes, which are produced byprinting technology or naturally occurring during the manufacturingprocess. However, most of these processes can hardly be applied toproducts having a metallic surface, such as guns, ammunition orcontainers made of metal.

A usual marking technology for marking such objects is laser engraving.Laser engraving technology usually is based on pseudo-random features,wherein the randomness is created by a numerical generator, but notbased on chaotic physical phenomena. Further, it is possible to copysuch marks by also using laser engraving technology.

MD 3389 F2 discloses a method and apparatus to mark electricallyconductive products in a random way using a welding type electrical arcand a vibrator to create randomness. According to this document,material from an electrode is transferred onto a pre-machined grid ofthe object to be marked to obtain a random mark. A randomness of themark, which consists of deposited metal on the surface of the object, isobtained by vibrating the electrode and translating the product relativeto the electrode. Here, the electrode opposed to the object to be markedis the “cathode” (−) in the electrical circuit, whereas the object to bemarked is the “anode” (+). This results in material to be transferredfrom the electrode towards the surface of the object.

However, also this principle does not result in a true random markingbecause the vibration of the electrode is controlled and can generallybe copied. Further, this method requires extra material of the electrodeto be consumed upon forming the mark. The method of the prior art iscomplicated because of the necessary grid and it requires the surface ofthe object to be pre-treated.

Accordingly, there is a need for a marking method and respective systemfor marking objects having a surface of a conductive material, such asmetal objects, which allow for uniquely marking objects in a way thatcannot be copied or counterfeited.

SUMMARY

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and adevice which allow for uniquely marking objects having a surface of aconductive material so that the mark can only very hardly, if notimpossibly, be reproduced, copied or counterfeited, but can easily berecognized and registered. It is a further object of the presentinvention to provide a method and a device which allow forauthenticating or identifying an object having a surface of a conductivematerial in a very reliable way.

This problem is solved by the method according to claim 1 or 13 and thesystem according to claim 17 or 25, respectively. Further preferredfeatures of the method or system are recited in the dependent claims anddetailed in the following description.

DESCRIPTION

A method for marking an object having a surface of a conductive materialcomprises a step of applying an electric spark to the surface of theobject such that the material of the surface is partially melted,partially ablated, or both, by the electric spark, thereby forming apattern on the object. This pattern can be used as a mark. By the abovemethod, a randomly shaped crater or a random distribution of randomlyshaped craters is created and the material is re-melted and re-depositedin the vicinity of the craters.

It can also be observed, using for example 3D microscopy, thatnon-molten or partially molten islands of the machined metal surface arepresent in the spark mark (see FIG. 3). These features are unique to thespark phenomenon and are impossible to reproduce with other markingtechniques.

Other unique features are large craters of more than 100 microns widthproduced by melting a significant amount of the surface material (seeFIG. 3). At the periphery of the spark mark, one can also observe verysmall craters of less than 10 microns width which are typically producedby a single anodic arc root. Other unique features are tiny splashes ofmolten metal of less than 2 microns width (FIG. 3).

The shapes and distribution of the craters as well as the re-melted andre-deposited material provide for a random and unique appearance of themark on the basis of the physical nature and the chaotic behaviour ofthe spark. This exhibits a complex three-dimensional microscopic andmacroscopic structure which can only very hardly, if not impossibly, becopied by any known technique, in particular laser engraving or similarmethods.

In particular, by using 3D microscopy, one can infer the typical craterdepth and protrusion height with respect to the original unmarkedsurface, as illustrated in FIG. 4.

A system for marking an object having a surface of a conductive materialcomprises a spark generator, a counter electrode electrically connectedto the spark generator such that the counter electrode forms an anodeand a connector for electrically connecting the spark generator to thesurface such that the surface forms a cathode with respect to thecounter electrode. The counter electrode is located with respect to thesurface such that an electric spark can be generated between the counterelectrode and the surface such that the material of the surface ispartially melted, partially ablated, or both, by the electric spark.Thereby, the above-mentioned pattern can be formed on the object.

Electrically connecting the spark generator to the surface encloses asituation in which the surface and the spark generator are both groundedor otherwise brought to the same electrical potential such that asufficient potential difference between the counter electrode and thesurface arises upon activation of the spark generator.

Benefits of the method are uniqueness of each obtained mark and theimpossibility to reproduce its topology by other means such as laserablation, printing or mechanical engraving.

FIGS. 5a and 5b illustrate marks obtained by various other engraving ormarking techniques, for comparison with a marking according to theinvention as exemplarily illustrated on FIG. 5 c.

When sparking a thick conductive surface, a mark in the material can beobtained having an erratic two-dimensional distribution with a rawstructure and a fine structure. In this context, “thick” means thickerthan several millimetres (but at least thicker than a half of amillimetre) and may depend on the material and sparking conditions. Themark obtained by the above method then has inherent three-dimensionalmicrometric scale properties as it consists of one or preferably manycraters and re-deposited molten material droplets (see FIGS. 3 and 4).

When sparking thin metallic surfaces, the material can be completelyablated in certain areas and a random mask with microscopic features canbe obtained. In this context, “thin” means a thickness of severalmicrometres (but at least thicker than one micrometre). If applied ontoa second material this mask could exhibit a security feature using, forexample, fluorescence from a background material.

The mark may depend on at least one of the nature of the material (bothchemical and topological like surface roughness) to be sparked, the timedistribution of the injected current in the spark's conductive channelgap, and the environment in which the spark is generated (e. g. air orargon, nitrogen or another inert gas). Varying these parameters allows agreat variety of mark appearances which hence allow extracting extremelydiverse features that can be used for generating a very high volume ofunique identifiers or attributes.

The obtained marks can have the potential of exhibiting, by light orelectron microscopy analysis, a topology and surface shape whichundoubtedly show that they are the result of sparks but no other means.Hence, the mark obtained by the above method is particularly secure withregard to copying or counterfeiting.

The timely duration of a spark being of the order of magnitude of tensof microseconds to hundreds of microseconds allows marking of labels onprinting lines, or of products on production lines, operating at acomparably high speed.

Accordingly, the spark marking process described herein allows for veryefficiently marking objects. The method does not take much time and isnot expensive. The method does not consume material but only modifiesthe material on the surface of the object. It is possible to apply amark on a relatively small area of the object which, in turn, allows themark to be applied also to very small objects such as the jackets ofammunition or similar objects. Also, thin metallic layers, such aslayers of metallic ink printed on a label, can be marked by the sparkmarking method described hereinabove. Further, it is not required thatthe surface of the object to be marked is specifically prepared,provided with anchor marks or otherwise pre-treated. Furthermore, theintrinsic complexity of the spark marks allows for guaranteeing a uniqueand irreproducible mark and a high capacity for information to beencoded onto the object to be marked.

The surface of a conductive material can preferably be a metallicsurface. This surface can be of a bulk metal or a foil of metaldeposited on an object of a different material. Further, it is possibleto apply the method also to objects having a surface provided with aconductive ink. The conductive nature of the surface is useful for thegeneration of the electric spark in order to modify the surface.Generally, it is also possible that the object is made of multiplelayers having a conductive material close to the actual surface so thatit is possible to apply a spark to the surface of the object via theconductive material closely underneath the actual surface of the object.Heat generated in the conductive material then still allows forpartially melting, partially ablating, or both, of material of theobject at the surface to thereby create the pattern of the mark.

An electric spark as understood in the present text can be furtherdescribed as follows. An electrical breakdown is created between twoelectrodes when a sufficiently high voltage is applied. When the highvoltage exceeds the breakdown voltage for a given electrode gap, gas,pressure and temperature, the breakdown mechanism occurs.

Several breakdown criteria for insulating gases have been reported byMeek, J. M. Craggs J. D. “Electrical Breakdown of Gases”, John Wiley &Sons, New York, U.S.A., 1978—initial publication in 1923, the content ofwhich is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Two well acceptedbreakdown criteria in gases are the “Townsend Breakdown Mechanism” asdescribed by Townsend, J. S. in “The Theory of Ionization of Gases byCollision”. Constable & Co. Ltd., London, U. K., 1910, the content ofwhich is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and the “StreamerBreakdown Mechanism” described by Loeb, L. B. Meek, J. M. in “TheMechanism of Spark Discharge in Air at Atmospheric Pressure. I II”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 438-447 459-474, 1940, thecontent of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The Townsend Breakdown Mechanism criterion is based on a sequence ofavalanches and depends on “remote” electron generation processes at thecathode. It usually prevails in low pressure conditions where electroncollisions are reduced in the electrode gap and is not relevant to sparkdischarges at atmospheric pressure, unless the electrode gap is verysmall.

The Streamer Breakdown Mechanism criterion depends on an avalanche tostreamer transition, due to “instantaneous” local electron generationgiving rise to a critical avalanche that causes instability in the gapand induces gap-breakdown.

In-between there is a transition region in which we observe some of bothmechanisms. The breakdown is an extremely fast process, taking placewithin several tenths of nanoseconds; this duration depends on thenature, pressure and temperature of the gas and also depends on theextent of the electrode gap.

When only high voltage is applied between the two electrodes, thedischarge is called “electrostatic discharge”. In this case, theconductive channel will vanish and the plasma will extinguish byrecombination processes and practically no substantial melting orablation of cathode material can occur. Hence, a mark on a materialwould be punctual and microscopic and not be a mark according to theunderstanding of the present description.

After the breakdown of the gap the voltage drops to several tenths ofvolts thank to an increase of the conductivity, current can be injectedfrom a current source into the conductive channel. The injected currentwill augment the ionization processes necessary to sustain the dischargeplasma.

The energy thus being applied to the cathode at the position where thespark foot is attached is sufficient for enabling partial melting and/orablating of cathode material. This process allows electrons to sustainthe spark current to be extracted from the cathode material. A part ofthe ablated material can then re-condensate nearby the crater created bythe ablation and may create favourable conditions for newmelting/ablation areas. This kind of chaotic hopping mechanism allowsfor random patterns of craters and deposited material on the surface ofthe cathode.

Spark generators and arrangements to ablate material are well known,especially in view of spectro-chemical analysis. They are used either inspark optical emission spectrometers/spectrographs, where the sparkplasma is the radiation source, or in inductively coupled plasmaspectrometers, where the sparks act as aerosol generators. A documentdescribing these arrangements is the “Compendium of AnalyticalNomenclature”, chapter 10, of the International Union of Pure andApplied Chemistry (IUPAC), available athttp://iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/Cha10sec3 13.pdf.

Usually, a spark generator comprises two circuits, the first one forcreating a gap breakdown high voltage and the second one for injectingcurrent into the conductive channel. These circuits can be set inparallel or in series.

Preferably, the conductive material of the object forms a “cathode” (−,emitting electrons or otherwise negatively charged particles), whereasthe counter electrode, by which a spark generator can form the electricspark, forms an “anode” (+, attracting electrons or otherwise negativelycharged particles). This configuration of the electrical circuit(s)prevents transfer of material from the electrode onto the surface of theobject to be marked and facilitates marking of the surface by melting orablating effects.

Further preferably, the surface is exposed to a gas, in particular air,argon or nitrogen or another inert gas, while the electric spark isapplied to the surface. The nature of the spark and, thus, the markcreated by the spark can be modified by influencing the atmosphere nextto the surface of the object. As an alternative to air, argon ornitrogen or another inert gas can be used to prevent oxidation of themark or the surface in the vicinity of the mark. Preferably, it ispossible to control the type and composition of the gas in that themethod is conducted in a housing where the atmosphere, in particular thetype of gas, its pressure and temperature can be reliably controlled.

Preferably, the method for marking the object further comprises taking afirst image of at least a part of the pattern, extracting at least onefirst characteristic feature from the first image of the pattern,associating the first characteristic feature to the object, and storinginformation of the first characteristic feature and the associatedobject.

Further preferably, the first characteristic feature is used to generatea first code, preferably an encrypted first code, the first codepreferably being attached or printed to the object. The first code canhave the form of a barcode, an alphanumeric code or a digital code suchas an RFID. It is preferred that the code is easily machine readable.

In a preferred embodiment, the pattern is assigned to a second code,preferably a serial number, which is independent of the pattern and isconfigured to serialize the pattern on the object, which second code ispreferably attached or printed to the object. The second code can be anidentification means for the object marked by the pattern. It is, thus,easily possible to read information as to the object when reading thesecond code without the need to evaluate the pattern on the object.However, the second code, alone, is not as secure as the mark applied bythe before-mentioned method. Hence, the second code is meant to be anadditional information on the object which can facilitate handling ofthe object.

In particular, the information of the first characteristic feature andthe associated object is stored in a remote storing device. A remotestoring device can be a central storage which preferably is availableremotely, e. g. via a secure network or similar data connection. Thus,it is possible to access the information stored in the remote storingdevice from almost any place.

A method of authenticating or identifying an object marked by using amethod as described above comprises taking a second image of at least apart of the pattern, extracting at least one second characteristicfeature from the second image of the pattern, and comparing informationof the second characteristic feature with the stored information of thefirst characteristic feature to identify matching information.

If an object, such as a gun, is to be authenticated or identified, thepattern on it can be imaged, characteristic features can be extractedfrom the pattern, at least from a part of it, and be compared tocorresponding features stored in a database. If the features are foundin the database as being assigned to a certain object, the object havingthe imaged pattern on it is identified or authenticated.

Preferably, at least one of the first and second code is read as well.In this case, it can additionally be confirmed whether the codes arecorrectly applied to or printed on the object.

In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the information of the secondcharacteristic and the at least one of the first and second code aretransmitted to a remote storing device. This allows for very reliablyauthenticating or identifying the object in that, on the basis of thesecond characteristic features extracted from the image of at least apart of the pattern, the comparable first characteristic feature can beidentified by comparing the information of the first and secondcharacteristic features so that the object being assigned to the firstcharacteristic feature is unambiguously identified or authenticated.

In a preferred embodiment, the first and second characteristic featurecomprises at least one of coordinates of individual craters or meltedzones of the pattern, preferably with respect to a reference mark, amean diameter of an individual crater or melted zone of the pattern, arelative distance between at least two craters or melted zones of thepattern, and a contour of the pattern or a part of the pattern.

As regards potential image processing algorithms or methods for extractand/or comparing characteristic features or information an image of apattern, reference is made to Dengsheng Zhang et al. “Review of shaperepresentation and description techniques”, Pattern Recognition 37(2004), 1-19, the content of which is hereby incorporated herein byreference. There are many possible methods, some of which being based oncontours, others on regions of the pattern to be determined. Bothcontours and regions can potentially be used in connection with thepresent invention.

There are modern trends in pattern recognition algorithms anddescriptors. In some of these, binary strings are used as descriptorsand the comparison or matching is performed using a Hamming distance.Examples of descriptors are:

-   -   BRIEF: (Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features)        -   Pairwise intensity comparison in an image patch.        -   The only parameters are the spatial arrangements and the            length.    -   BRISK: (Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints)        -   Same as BRIEF but with a fixed spatial arrangement, and also            orientation and scale estimation.    -   FREAK: (Fast Retina Keypoint)        -   Spatial arrangement motivated by the human visual system.        -   Pairs of pixels used for comparison are learned using            training data.

An example of image matching is given in FIG. 6.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a setup of a system for marking anobject in accordance with the present invention.

FIGS. 2a and 2b illustrate a typical mark 18 obtained by a single sparkin argon atmosphere on a metallic object.

FIGS. 3a and 3b show remarkable topological features which are typicallyobserved on a spark mark. Such features are e. g. displaced non-moltenislands 23, large and deep craters 24 of widths of up to 100 μm, smallcraters 25 of widths of less than 10 μm or tiny molten metal splashes 26of widths of typically about 2 μm.

FIG. 4a illustrates a typical spark mark in top view.

FIG. 4b illustrates a vertical profile of the spark mark of FIG. 4aalong dotted line 240 in FIG. 4a . The vertical profile showsprotrusions 27 from the originally planar horizontal surface 29 of up to10 μm and craters 28 of depths of up to 20 μm from the originally planarhorizontal surface. Non-molten islands protrude from their initialposition on the original surface up to 15 μm.

FIGS. 5a to 5c give examples of surface textures which are typical forvarious marking and engraving techniques as compared to spark marks.FIG. 5a shows images of surfaces marked by acid etching 51, sandblasting 52, anodizing 53, plasma spraying 54 and laser ablation 55,FIG. 5b shows images of surfaces treated with laser marking 56, FIG. 5cshows a spark mark 57 according to the invention.

FIGS. 6a 1, 6 a 2, 6 b 1 and 6 b 2 show illustrations of a method toextract image features and to determine whether an image matches areference image (allowing thus the identification of a mark). FIGS. 6a 1and 6 a 2 illustrate a comparison of two different images of the samemark, 60 and 70, taken by different cameras. FIGS. 6b 1 and 6 b 2illustrate a comparison of two different images, 61 and 71, of twodifferent marks, taken by different cameras.

FIG. 7a illustrates typical histograms of local binary patterns 40. InFIG. 7a , 41 represents a model of a genuine spark mark texture. Ahistogram of a real genuine spark mark texture is represented by 42 anda histogram of a fake spark mark texture is represented by 43, i. e. amark which resulted from a technique other than spark mark.

FIG. 7b illustrates the differences 33 of the histograms of the realgenuine spark mark and the genuine spark mark model 31, on the one hand,and the real fake spark mark and the genuine spark mark model 30, on theother hand. FIG. 7b shows that spark marks can be discriminated in mostcases 32 using only one configuration of the LBP operator.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a setup of a system 10 for marking anobject 18 in accordance with a preferred embodiment. The system 10 forproducing sparks and thereby generating random marks as described abovecomprises a spark generator 12, a counter electrode 14 and a connector16 for electrically connecting the spark generator 12 to the object 18to be marked. Optionally, the system comprises a housing 20 forcontrolling a protective gas environment above the object to be marked.The housing may further confine the protective gas. The spark generator12 is electrically connected to the counter electrode 14 and the object18.

A single mark 22 obtained from a single spark created between thecounter electrode 14 and a clean and non-oxidized metallic surface ofthe object 18 may spread over several square millimetres and may presenta three dimensional raw structure and fine structure. The mark mayconsist of hundreds of microscopic craters, from which material wasablated, and sample deposits, created by condensation of a part of theablated material or solidification of molten material. Then, the markpresents a raw structure in the form of compact “islands”, as isexemplarily illustrated in FIG. 2a , and a fine structure in the form ofcathodic craters and deposited spots, as is exemplarily illustrated inFIGS. 2b, 3a and 3b . The localization, together with the depth of thecraters 28 and the height of the deposits or protrusions 27, asillustrated in FIGS. 4a and 4b , is random and can, by use of means ormethods available today, not be reproduced (see FIGS. 5a-5c ).

The topology of the raw structure and the contours can be used even ifimaging capabilities are insufficient to visualize microscopic details.This may be the case if, for example, a photo camera of a smartphone orother handheld device is used for identifying the mark. Extractingfeatures of similar size is well known in the field of image processingand computer vision. An illustration is given in FIG. 6a 1 and FIG. 6a2, where characteristic features 65 and 66 can be extracted from bothimages 60 and 70 of the same mark taken with different cameras.

Texture analysis can be used to determine if a mark has been created bysparking the metal's surface or by another mean such as the onesdescribed in connection with FIGS. 5a and 5b . This can generally bedone for authentication purposes, without identifying a particular markassociated uniquely with a marked object, i. e. without identifying aparticular object. One example of texture analysis makes use of a LocalBinary Patterns (LBP). These are simple operators describingmicrostructures around a pixel (Texton). They are robust to (global)grayscale variations and rotation invariant. They are parameterized bythe radius of search and the number of neighbors for each pixel in theimage. For the current examples, the simplest LBP operator, using 8neighboring pixels, was used. The texture is represented by thedistribution of the uniform LBP codes computed at each pixel and acrossthe whole image. Texture identification is made through histogramcomparison.

An example of texture recognition and matching is presented in FIGS. 7aand 7b . FIG. 7a shows histograms of the LBP occurrences for the modelspark mark 41, an example of a genuine spark mark 42 and a mark obtainedby another technique 43 (also named as a fake mark). FIG. 7b shows thatthe genuine and fake marks can be discriminated from their respectivehistogram distance 33 to the spark mark model. A clear separation of thehistogram distance of the fake mark to the model 30 from the histogramdistance of the genuine mark to the model 31 is achievable using onlyone LBP scheme for several different samples 32.

The detection of the macrostructure and microstructure of a mark can becompared to the problem of “blobs detection”. Blobs detection refers tomathematical methods that are aimed at detecting regions in a digitalimage that differ in properties, such as brightness, compared to areassurrounding those regions. The blobs are efficiently detected bystandard image processing algorithms and their properties can becalculated to extract specific signatures as illustrated in FIGS. 6a 1and 6 a 2 where the blobs 65 and 66 can be detected and matched on twoimages of the same spark mark taken with different cameras. In FIG. 6a1, image 60 corresponds to the image used to enroll the specificsignature of the mark in the database, and image 70 in FIG. 6a 2corresponds to the image of the same spark mark to be authenticated andidentified. On the other hand, FIG. 6b 2 shows a candidate image 71which does not come from the same spark marks as the one enrolled 61 andillustrated in FIG. 6b 1. Here no common features are found.

The topology of the microscopic structure, contours, and the brilliantand dark aspect modification by changing an illumination, a focusingplane or a viewing angle can be used to characterize the fine structurefor example small craters 25 or tiny molten metal splashes 26 as shownin FIGS. 3a and 3b . This is possible by using, for example, lightmicroscopy. Information extracted from the fine structure can be usedeither for semi-forensic authentication to guarantee that a given markhas been produced by spark, or to determine a specific signature at amicroscopic level. For the latter, it would be preferable to enrollsignatures with a standard microscopic imaging process which isreproducible.

By changing a focusing plane of a light microscope, under constantillumination, evidence of 3D structures can be obtained (see FIG. 3b andFIGS. 4a and 4b ). Similarly, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)technology can be used to identify 3D structures of the marks obtainedfrom spark marking as described herein. A 3D structure, such asillustrated in FIGS. 3b, 4a and 4b , of small dark craters representingmaterial ablation and larger bumps visualizing solidified metal dropletscan be examined and be used for identification or authenticationpurposes. This structure is very specific to the spark cathodic rooteffect on the surface and cannot be reproduced by any other markingprocess known today. FIGS. 3a and 3b illustrate some remarkablestructures found in spark marks.

The materials to be marked are preferably metallic. Examples are thinmetallic strips in banderols or bulk metallic parts, products, cans,etc. The metallic surface preferably is clean, free of grease,non-oxidized and with a roughness equivalent to that obtained by finemilling, grinding or cold rolling. Although pre-treating the surface isnot essential for the method or system to work, a standard appearance ofthe surface before the application of the method to the surface or therespective object, respectively, facilitates using the marks foridentification or authentication. A typical average roughness Ra forthese kinds of manufacturing methods is 6 micrometers or 250micro-inches, as expressed, for example, by the US standard ASME Y14.36Mor the ISO 1302, or preferably less. However, also rougher surfaces aregenerally suitable to be treated by the above method.

In one exemplary application of the method, metallic strips integratedon banderols can be sparked for secure marking. A spark marking can beapplied at a specific part of the strips. The strip may be of Al, Cu,Ti, Ag, or any of their alloys or other soft metal.

In another exemplary application, canned products are marked, directlyon the protected or unprotected can material. Usually, the outsidesurface of metallic cans is protected by a thin layer of UV curedbasecoat epoxy and/or acrylic. This layer can be ablated by the sparkand a combined mark: varnish and metal can be obtained, depending on thespark energy. Marking of other types of metallic containers, such asperfume, jewellery or valuable luxury goods boxes or containers can alsobe performed by the sparking method. The metallic luxury productsthemselves can be also marked. For example the metallic parts ofjewellery, which may be of Au, Ag, Pt, Pd and other precious metals orof their alloys can be marked by the method of the present invention.

In another exemplary application, guns and ammunition cartridges aremarked by the sparking method. Preferably, the marks can be produced ona clean metallic area of the part or on an area which has been digitallymarked before, e. g. embossed or engraved. The engraved marks can directthe spark so that the mark is created around any engraved symbols. Thefinal pattern will hence be a combination of a deterministic digitalmark, such as a serial number, and additional random and unique featuresproduced by the spark method.

In another exemplary application, a surface of a conductive materialpresent on some mechanical component or spare part used in motorindustry or in aeronautic industry is marked by the sparking methodaccording to the invention. This is particularly useful for identifyingor authenticating components which are important with respect to safetyof users: for example, brake linings of a car or landing gear of anaircraft. Indeed, these (usually expensive) components are more and morefrequently counterfeited, with the consequence that they generally donot fulfil required quality standards.

As an illustrative example, a marking system using spark dischargeaccording to the invention comprises the following elements:

1. A unidirectional spark generator providing high voltage of 6-15 kV tobreak the gap between the electrode and the surface to be sparked andfurther injecting current with various time patterns and energies.Depending on the metal type, the injected current takes values between10-150 Amps, while the voltage is around 30 V. The spark duration frombreakdown to the extinction can be between 30 and 200 microseconds.

In this example of a marking system, the discharge process has threemain periods:

Firstly, a short burst of less than 1 microsecond, in which the highvoltage is applied and the breakdown occurs;secondly, a second phase, in which current of up to several tenths ofAmperes is injected, with a duration of 2 to 10 microseconds; andthirdly, a third phase, in which the current is decreased and maintainedat a level of less than 20 Amperes. The duration of this third phase canbe between 50 and 200 microseconds, e. g. depending on the type ofmetal.

Such spark generators are well known and used mainly for thespark-Atomic Emission or optical emission spectrometers, in the scope ofspectro-chemical analysis of metals and their alloys. A referencedocument describing a spark generator is WO 2010/066644 A1, the contentof which being hereby incorporated herein by reference.

2. A discharge gap, formed by a counter electrode, usually made of, butnot limited to, tungsten which counter electrode is configured to act asthe anode, on the one hand, and the material to be sparked at groundpotential, which is thereby configured to act as the cathode, on theother hand. The material can be put to ground potential by a contactelectrode.3. Optionally, the counter electrode and the material can be surroundedby a protective gas such as argon or nitrogen or another inert gas,which may be confined in a protective housing 20, in order to preventoxidation of the mark.4. Optionally, the counter electrode can be annular and configured forthe protective inert gas to be injected through the tip of theelectrode. Or the electrode can be surrounded by a co-axial, annular gasinjection nozzle.

An illustrative example of a configuration for marking, enrolment andactivation of marked objects is described below.

A first operation is the spark marking as outlined above of the guns.The objects, for example guns, parts of guns or ammunition jackets, tobe marked are kept by electrically grounded chucks mounted on a conveyerin such a way that the surface to be marked is presented in the sameorientation and at the same distance from the counter electrode. Themark is created on the object and subsequently the mark is imaged by acombined light source and camera module. After the image is acquired,the individual features of the mark are extracted and encoded.

The code and optionally the image are securely sent to a data managementsystem and enrolled in a database.

After the objects, for example the guns, have been delivered to theirusers, they can be examined by using an adequate handheld device capableof macro-imaging, extracting the image macro features, and sending theobtained code and/or the image via a secured link to the data managementsystem.

Here the received information, namely, the code and/or the image arematched to the existing records in the database so that the object canbe identified on the basis of the enrolled entry of the database.

A higher level of authentication of the mark can be made in a localmicroscopy laboratory, if the handheld device is not capable ofmicroscopically examining the marked object.

The mark can be authenticated by a handheld device or with laboratoryequipment.

Usually, with a handheld device and using ambient or specificillumination, details of a size of more than 10 micrometers can beobserved so that the raw structure characteristics can be observed. Inthis case, the image processing will be based especially on the topologyand contour recognition of the agglomerates of cathodic craters andmaterial deposits and no interpretation will be made on the luminosityof the elements in the image. The topology and the contour details areinformation vectors and can be coded. The coding process can be made onthe device and the result can be sent, in an encrypted communication toa data management system for interrogating the authenticity, similar tothe above described method.

Laboratory equipment for authenticating may comprise an opticalmicroscope using polarized light. The microscope can detect peaks ofre-melted material as well as valleys or craters of ablated material byimaging bright and dark patterns. By changing the focusing plane, brightareas can change to dark areas while maintaining their shape.

Further, the microscope can be used with an automated image processingsoftware that can recognise patterns of elementary cathodic craters. Thesoftware could perform texture analysis algorithms with a predefinedmodel, such as, for example Local Binary Pattern analysis to determineif the observed mark belongs to the class of spark marks and not toother types of marking techniques shown for example in FIGS. 5a and 5bas described in connection with FIGS. 7a and 7 b.

Examples for a basis of an authentication or identifying method:

1) Shape Signature

A shape signature represents a shape by a one dimensional functionderived from shape boundary points. Many shape signatures exist. Theyinclude centroidal profile, complex coordinates, centroid distance,tangent angle, cumulative angle, curvature, area and chord-length.

2) Scale Space

A scale space representation of a shape can be created by tracking aposition of inflection points in a shape boundary filtered by low-passGaussian filters of variable widths. As the width of Gaussian filterincreases, insignificant inflections are eliminated from the boundaryand the shape becomes smoother. The inflection points that remainpresent in the representation are expected to be significant objectcharacteristics. The result of this smoothing process is an intervaltree, called fingerprint, consisting of inflection points.

While the invention has been described above with respect to certainexamples and embodiments, the scope of protection is not limited bythese examples or embodiments.

1. Method for marking an object (18), the object (18) having a surfaceof a conductive material, the method comprising applying an electricspark to the surface such that the material is at least one of partiallymelted and partially ablated by the electric spark, thereby forming apattern on the object, wherein the surface is exposed to a gas while theelectric spark is applied to the surface, and wherein the electric sparkcomprises two subsequent phases, a first phase where a conductivechannel is formed and a second phase where current is injected into theconductive channel for at least one of partially melting and partiallyablating the material.
 2. Method of claim 1, wherein a spark generator(12) is electrically connected to the conductive material and to acounter electrode (14), the conductive material thus forming a cathodeand the counter electrode (16) thus forming an anode.
 3. Method of claim1, wherein the gas is air, argon or nitrogen.
 4. Method of claim 1,wherein the spark takes ten microseconds up to several hundredmicroseconds.
 5. Method of claim 1, wherein the first phase is shorterthan the second phase.
 6. Method of claim 1, wherein the materialcomprises at least one of a metal, such as iron, steel, aluminum,copper, titanium or alloys of these metals, and a conductive compositematerial.
 7. Method of claim 1, wherein the object (18) is a gun, apiece of ammunition, a can, a value good, a package, a label, a piece ofjewelry, or part thereof.
 8. Method of claim 1, further comprisingtaking a first image of at least a part of the pattern, extracting atleast one first characteristic feature from the first image of thepattern, associating the first characteristic feature to the object(18), and storing information of the first characteristic feature andthe associated object (18).
 9. Method of claim 8, wherein the firstcharacteristic feature is used to generate a first code, preferably anencrypted first code, the first code preferably being attached orprinted to the object.
 10. Method of claim 8, wherein the pattern isassigned to a second code, preferably a serial number, which isindependent of the pattern and is configured to serialize the pattern onthe object, which second code is preferably attached or printed to theobject.
 11. Method of claim 8, wherein the information of the firstcharacteristic feature and the associated object is stored in a remotestoring device.
 12. Method of authenticating or identifying an object(18) marked by using a method of claim 8, the method for authenticatingcomprising taking a second image of at least a part of the pattern,extracting at least one second characteristic feature from the secondimage of the pattern, comparing information of the second characteristicfeature with the stored information of the first characteristic featureto identify matching information.
 13. Method of claim 12, furthercomprising reading at least one of the first and second code.
 14. Methodof claim 12, further comprising transmitting at least one of theinformation of the second characteristic and the at least one of thefirst and second code to the remote storing device.
 15. Method of claim8, wherein the first and second characteristic feature comprises atleast one of coordinates of individual craters or melted zones of thepattern, preferably with respect to a reference mark, a mean diameter ofan individual crater or melted zone of the pattern, a relative distancebetween at least two craters or melted zones of the pattern, and acontour of the pattern or a part of the pattern.
 16. Marking system (10)for marking an object (18), the object (18) having a surface of aconductive material, the system comprising a spark generator (12), acounter electrode (14) electrically connected to the spark generator(12) such that the counter electrode (14) forms an anode, a connector(16) for electrically connecting the spark generator (12) to the surfacesuch that the surface forms a cathode with respect to the counterelectrode (14), wherein the counter electrode (14) is located withrespect to the surface such that an electric spark can be generatedbetween the counter electrode (14) and the surface, wherein the electricspark comprises two subsequent phases, a first phase where a conductivechannel is formed and a second phase where current is injected into theconductive channel for at least one of partially melting and partiallyablating the material, such that the material is at least one ofpartially melted and partially ablated by the electric spark, therebyforming a pattern on the object, the marking system (10) comprising ahousing (20) enclosing a space between the counter electrode (14) andthe surface, wherein the housing (20) is filled with a gas.
 17. Markingsystem (10) of claim 16, wherein the counter electrode (14) comprisestungsten.
 18. Marking system (10) of claim 16, wherein the gas is air,argon or nitrogen.
 19. Marking system (10) of claim 18, wherein thecounter electrode (14) is configured for the gas to be injected throughthe tip of the counter electrode (14) into the housing (20), or whereinthe counter electrode (14) is surrounded by a co-axial gas injectionnozzle configured for the gas to be injected into the housing (20). 20.Marking system (10) of claim 16, wherein the material comprises at leastone of a metal, such as iron, steel, aluminum, copper, titanium oralloys of these metals, and a conductive composite material.
 21. Markingsystem (10) of claim 16, wherein the object (18) is a gun, a piece ofammunition, a can, a value good, a package, a label, a piece of jewelry,or part thereof.
 22. Marking system (10) of claim 16, further comprisinga first imaging device for taking a first image of at least a part ofthe pattern, a first extracting means for extracting at least one firstcharacteristic feature from the first image of the pattern, anassociating means for associating the first characteristic feature tothe object (18), and a storing means for storing information of thefirst characteristic feature and the associated object (18).
 23. Markingsystem (10) of claim 22, further comprising a storing device, whereinthe storing means is adapted for storing the information of the firstcharacteristic feature and the associated object (18) in the storingdevice, wherein the storing device preferably is remote from the firstimaging device.
 24. Authenticating system for authenticating oridentifying an object (18), according to the method of claim 12, theauthenticating system comprising the marking system (10) comprising: afirst imaging device for taking a first image of at least a part of thepattern, a first extracting means for extracting at least one firstcharacteristic feature from the first image of the pattern, anassociating means for associating the first characteristic feature tothe object (18), and a storing means for storing information of thefirst characteristic feature and the associated object (18), a secondimaging device for taking a second image of at least a part of thepattern, a second extracting means configured for extracting at leastone second characteristic feature from the second image of the pattern,and a comparing means configured for comparing information of the secondcharacteristic feature with the stored information of the firstcharacteristic feature for identifying matching information. 25.Authenticating system of claim 24, further comprising a reading meansfor reading a code, preferably a barcode or alphanumeric code on theobject (18).
 26. Authenticating system of claim 24, further comprising atransmitting means for transmitting at least one of the information ofthe second characteristic and the code to the storing means.